← Wilczek - Regional Championships - PTM - 28/02/2026

Water AetherwingTier 2

at Wilczek - Regional Championships - PTM - 28/02/2026

decks
2 (5.4% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
10 2-5-3
overall winrate
35.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
43.6% avg ELO -2.9 per match
expected value
47.4% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
48.7% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↓ low
mean ELO 1127 · median 1127 · range 1111–1142 (2 pilots with an ELO rating)
983 Q1 1148 Q3 1349 1510
0% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 100% in the bottom. This deck is favored by lower-rated players — its raw winrate may understate how good it is.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Umbra Guardian 10.8% 0
Fire Crux Mage 8.1% 0
Wind Shadowstrike 8.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.2% +14.7
Fire Firebloom Burn 5.4% 0
Fire Slimes 5.4% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 45.8% -4.1
Water Fractal 5.4% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 5.4% 0
Wind Razorgale 5.4% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.9% -14.6
Wind Seiryuu 5.4% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 43.3% -6.4
Fire Aggro 2.7% 0
Fire Arcane 2.7% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.6% +13.8
Fire Luxem Assassin 2.7% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.6% -11.8
Fire Suited 2.7% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 44.1% -9.4
Fire Suzaku 2.7% 0
Fire Umbra Alice 2.7% 0
Horse and Taxes 2.7% 0
Water Genbu 2.7% 0
Water Ravishing Mill 2.7% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 49.8% -0.3
Wind Allies 2.7% 0
Wind Arcane 2.7% 0
Wind Umbra Ranger 2.7% 0
Wind Wakeup Combo 2.7% 0
Decklists · 2 from this event

The 2 public Water Aetherwing decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 28 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 28 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Chained Charge +1.00 1 0 0
Refreshing Charge +1.00 1 0 0
Dissuading Aether +1.00 1 0 0
Myopic Lens +1.00 1 0 0
Undercurrent Vantage +1.00 1 0 0
Unbroken Mustang -1.00 0 1 0
Cheshire Cat, Impish Grin -1.00 0 1 0
Staggering Strike -1.00 0 1 0
Palvor Sword -1.00 0 1 0
Snow Fairy -1.00 0 1 0
Stolen Chance -1.00 0 1 0
Diana, Judgment's Arrow +1.00 1 0 0
Yuan Shao, Crown General -1.00 0 1 0
Snow White, Weiss Queen -1.00 0 1 0
Grand Crusader's Ring +1.00 1 0 0
Ranger Strides -1.00 0 1 0
Enfeebling Orb +1.00 1 0 0
Languid Toadtroll -1.00 0 1 0
Foresight Lens +1.00 1 0 0
Drown in Aether +1.00 1 0 0
Inert Sword -1.00 0 1 0
Trivariate Dream +1.00 1 0 0
Backstep -1.00 0 1 0
The Looking Glass -1.00 0 1 0
Bauble of Scarcity -1.00 0 1 0
Tariff Ring +1.00 1 0 0
Alacritous Huntress +1.00 1 0 0
Take Aim -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/46846/archetypes/Water Aetherwing